This week has helped me see how climate change is a
political issue as well as an environmental problem. Barnes states, “They are concerned about
changes in the water supply, but they link these not to shifting climatic
parameters but to the political and technical decisions that act as
intermediaries between the water falling from the sky as rain and them
receiving it.” This shows how there are
other decisions that are in place that can determine how much water one person
gets. Also in this chapter there the
three perspectives of Egypt’s water. One
of these depends on the actions of other countries that lie upstream within the
Nile Basin and how this affects Nile flows to Egypt. Therefore, the decisions of surrounding
nations affect Egypt’s water supply. Going
along with this is the idea that the most politically connected and influential
among Egyptians will always receive the water they need, this shows the
inequality experienced there. As for the
development attempted with REDD+ in Vietnam, it is clear to see there are areas
that seem to be lacking. The checklist
idea seems good in a way to make sure a country is ready for the implementation
of a program. However, this model might
not be having the full impact on preparing an area because it is not very in
depth and leaves out aspects. An
equality aspect in this chapter by McElwee was how ethnic minorities were often
blamed for being agents of deforestation.
These chapters helped me see how important it to individualize an
environmental plan for a specific nation or region because each area is unique
in it’s need and with its differences in societal relations.
No comments:
Post a Comment